Lost in Spaaaace
Nov. 8th, 2004 11:28 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Random Lost thoughts. very random. you have been warned.
i keep seeing people all up in arms about Confidence Man. and it hasnt even aired.
people are attacking Sawyer, attacking Jack, Sayid, everybody!
but there seems to be one thing that everyone has missed.
We dont even know if Sawyer has Shannon's meds.
seriously, we dont. all we know at this point is that Boone says Sawyer has them.
its possible, he could. and yes, if he is witholding meds from someone who might die without them, then yes, i might concede he is evil and go back to admiring his fine fine self with enjoyment for the bad boy.
buts its also possible that he DOESNT have them. but rather than ask, everyone immediately assumes Boone is right, and insists on him giving them up.
now, if you are a jackass with a grudge against authority and being ordered around, are you going to defend yourself and insist on your innocence?
the answer? NO.
They already think he is guilty. Why would he chose to argue something they arent going to believe anyway?
Sorry, off soapbox, but the people who are insisting Sawyer needs to be beaten for something we dont know that he did are starting to make me slightly cranky.
Also:
i really want a lost moodtheme. ive seen one already, but i want a specific kind of mood theme.
i dont want "annoyed" and "happy" and "giggly."
Damnit, i want "bitchy" Shannon, "drugged" and "shaky" Charlie, "life saving" Jack, "pregnant" (or at least "bloated" or "craving") Claire, "psychopathic" Locke (cause he so is. i dont care how much i like him. he is FREAKY.), "protective" Boone, "nameless" extras.
See? wouldnt that be FUN?
Somebody, get to work!
i keep seeing people all up in arms about Confidence Man. and it hasnt even aired.
people are attacking Sawyer, attacking Jack, Sayid, everybody!
but there seems to be one thing that everyone has missed.
We dont even know if Sawyer has Shannon's meds.
seriously, we dont. all we know at this point is that Boone says Sawyer has them.
its possible, he could. and yes, if he is witholding meds from someone who might die without them, then yes, i might concede he is evil and go back to admiring his fine fine self with enjoyment for the bad boy.
buts its also possible that he DOESNT have them. but rather than ask, everyone immediately assumes Boone is right, and insists on him giving them up.
now, if you are a jackass with a grudge against authority and being ordered around, are you going to defend yourself and insist on your innocence?
the answer? NO.
They already think he is guilty. Why would he chose to argue something they arent going to believe anyway?
Sorry, off soapbox, but the people who are insisting Sawyer needs to be beaten for something we dont know that he did are starting to make me slightly cranky.
Also:
i really want a lost moodtheme. ive seen one already, but i want a specific kind of mood theme.
i dont want "annoyed" and "happy" and "giggly."
Damnit, i want "bitchy" Shannon, "drugged" and "shaky" Charlie, "life saving" Jack, "pregnant" (or at least "bloated" or "craving") Claire, "psychopathic" Locke (cause he so is. i dont care how much i like him. he is FREAKY.), "protective" Boone, "nameless" extras.
See? wouldnt that be FUN?
Somebody, get to work!
no subject
Date: 2004-11-09 03:25 am (UTC)and yeah, Sawyer has few redeeming qualities (except for his fine fine self), but thats one of the reasons i like him. i like my evil pretty and hard to figure. makes things more fun. plus, not everyone can be shiny and happy and helpful.
and yeah, the cave in thing was uncool to the extreme. but i can justify his behavior. which is how i always know that a character is going to be high on my list of fav people.
so yeah, hes a bad guy. and i like it. and i maintain my innocent until proven guilty. until he actually says, "I have it, and refuse to give it to you." until then, im going to insist that he doesnt have it, and that everyone is just picking on my poor Sawyer. so there. :P
no subject
Date: 2004-11-09 04:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-09 09:27 pm (UTC)